تحلیلی بر سطح توسعه فرهنگی شهر اصفهان با استفاده از روش تحلیل عاملی

نویسندگان

چکیده

  هدف از این پژوهش، تعیین و تحلیل سطح توسعه فرهنگی و نابرابری ناحیه­ای مناطق شهری اصفهان با استفاده از تکنیک تحلیل عاملی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، 14منطقه شهرداری اصفهان است. رویکرد حاکم بر این پژوهش «توصیفی-کمی و تحلیلی » است. در این پژوهش 35 شاخص با روش تحلیل عاملی خلاصه شده و به 5 عامل تقلیل یافته و به صورت ترکیبی در عوامل معنی دار ارایه گردیده­اند. با بهره­گیری از تکنیک مزبور سهم عوامل تأثیرگذار در توسعه ی فرهنگی مناطق مشخص گردید. بدین صورت که هر یک از شاخص‌های بار گذاری شده در عامل‌ها مشخص و با استفاده از امتیاز عاملی مناطق رتبه­بندی شده است و در نهایت، براساس رتبه عامل‌ها، مناطق در پنج سطح مشخص شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش حاکی از آن است که این پنج عامل، روی هم رفته11/93 درصد از واریانس را محاسبه و تبیین می­کنند. عامل اول به تنهایی 12/53 درصد و عوامل بعدی به ترتیب 22/17، 11، 38/4 و 38/4 درصد از واریانس را محاسبه و توضیح می­دهند. در این صورت توزیع امکانات و فضاهای فرهنگی در بین مناطق متعادل نیست.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of cultural development of Isfahan city Using Factor analysis method

نویسندگان [English]

  • M. Izadi
  • J. Mohammadi
چکیده [English]

Analysis of cultural development of Isfahan city Using Factor analysis method


J.Mohammadi, M.Izadi
Received: October 08, 2011/ Accepted: April 10, 2012, 23-25 P





Extended abstract
1-Introduction
Cultural spaces are consideredas one of the main factors for development. Cultural development is a qualitative and valuable process that for assessing it, quantitative indicators in cultural planning are used to obtain development objectives in the pattern of goods and services. The aim of the study is to determine and analyze cultural development level and regional inequality of different districts of Isfahan using factor analysis technique. The statistical population of the study is 14 districts of Isfahan municipality. The dominant approach ofthis study is quantitative – description and analytical. In this study, 35 indices have been summarized by factor analysis method and have been reduced to 5 factors and combined in significant ones and delivered.

2 – Theoretical bases
The most important objectives of spatial planning, considering limitation of resources, are optimum distributions of facilities and services among different locations in which people live. To do this,there is a need to identify different locations in terms of having different facilities and services, so that developed locations are specified and planners can proceed to do something for spatial equilibrium and reducing privileged distance between districts.The present study has been conducted to reach to an equal development in Isfahan urban districts following identifying the situation and the manner of distributing development facilities cultural selected indices in different districts.

3 – Discussion
Cultural development of societies is evaluated by considering the changes and improvement of its indices and measured by quantitative frames. Cultural development indices are the most important tools for cultural planning in a special district in a society. In this study, cultural development indices have been used to determine the levels of districts. By using factor analysis model, the share of influential factors in the cultural development of districtswas determined. These five factors all together specify 93.11 percent of variance. The first factor alone calculates and describes 53.12 percent and other factors 17.22, 11, 4.38 and 4.38 percent of variance respectively.

4 – Conclusion
Based on performed analyses, 35 selected indices of cultural development have been reduced to 5, via factor analysis model and the share of each factor in the development was determined. 5 created factors are able to calculate and describe 93.11 percent of variance. The first factor alone calculates 53.12 percent and the other factors calculate and describe 17.22, 11, 4.38, and 4.38 percent of variance, respectively. The results of this analysis declare that to develop cultural services for the districts, the first, third and the second factors are suggested as first priorities for developing Isfahan urban districts for much disprivileged, disprivileged, semi privileged, privileged and much privileged districts respectively. The fourth factor can be effective in second priority to increase semi privileged development level.The fifth factor can be effective in the third priority to increase the development level of disprivileged and muchdisprivileged districts.

5 – Suggestions
Since the aim of such studies is to identify the status quo in terms of cultural development factors, plentiful and various proceedings are needed to correctly and precisely plan for districts in order to reach social justices and remove disprivileged situation from different districts. So, in order to be responsive to the increasing cultural needs of Isfahan urban districts, people's contribution and participation and agencies cooperation and the most important of all private sectors help interested in investment are needed. Also, the development and improvement of information technology in the pattern of reinforcing and developing institutions, structural amendments in rules and laws and making benefit of new achievements in providing cultural services are very important.
Keyword: Spatial analysis, Cultural Development, Factor analysis method, Isfahan city.

References
Azemi, Hossein (2004), Circuits of underdevelopment Iran's economy,nay press, Fifth Edition.
Azemi, Nasser (2002), exploring the fundamentals of urbanization and urban systems, Nekapress, Tehran.
Consulting Engineers, Translated by Abutalebfanai and others (1992), Guidelines for planning rural centers, Rural and Development press, No.10.
Fanni, Zohre (2004), small cities another phenomenon in regional development, First edition, ministry of interior.
Ghanbari Haft cheshme, Abolfazl&KarimHosseinzadedalir (2005), specification of thedegree of development in townships of Eastern Azarbaijan Province 1375, Geography and areal development journal Mashhad Ferdosi University No.5, 113-123.
Hekmatnia, Hassan, Mousavi, Mirnajaf(2006), model application in Geography emphasizing rural and planning, ElmeNovin press, first edition.
Kalantari, Khalil (2001), Planning and regional development, theories and techniques, khoshbin press, First Edition, Tehran.
Kalantari, khalil (2003), data process and analysis in socioeconomic researches, Tehran, sharif press.
MasoumiAshkevri, Hassan (1993), principles and methods of regional planning.
Mohammadi, Jamal (2002), an analysis of quantitative concepts and their role in urban and regional planning, Geographic space journal, Ahar Open University, 2, 87-102.
MokhtariMalekabadi, Reza (2007), Impact of information technology on urban land use planning (Case Study: _ recreational and cultural uses in the city Isfahan), Ph.D. dissertation, Isfahan University.
Mousavi, Mirnajaf ,Hekmatnia , Hassan, (2005),Analysis and synthesis of the factors causing the development of areas Iran, Geography and Development journal, Fall and Winter.
Mohammad Mouliyae (2007), Comparing the degree of development of the service sector and social welfare of the province during 1373 and 1383, Quarterly of Welfare, Sixth year, No.24.
PapolyYazdi, Mohammad Hossein and RajabiSnajrdy, Hossein (2008), View of the city and surrounding, samt Press, Third Edition.
Javadi, Nasrin (2005), Cultural development of the province, Limitations and Solutions, Iran journal, No.141.
Sarafi, Mozafar (1989), planning basics of regional Development.
Talabi, Hoashang&zangiabadi, Ali, 2001."Index analysis and identification of effective factors in the methodology of Human development of Iran's big cities" Quarterly of geographic research No.60, 124-142.
Taghvai, Masoud (2007), services in rural villages in ChaharMahal and Bakhtiari Villages,
University Research of Isfahan Journal, Volume 24, NO.3.
Taheri, Shahnam (2001), Economic Development and Planning, Havaitazeh press, Third Edition, Tehran.
Zangiabadi, Ali (1999), analysis and organization of spatial structure of urban development indices in cities with a population of over one hundred. Ph.D. dissertation, Isfahan University.
Ziyari, Karamatolah (2000), Assess the degree of cultural development in Iran, Social Science of the letter journal, N.16.
UNESCO, Translated by Mohammad Fazeli (2000), Scientific Strategies Cultural development, tebyan press.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Spatial Analysis
  • Cultural development
  • Factor analysis method
  • Isfahan city