معاونت پژوهش و فناوری دانشگاه اصفهان مطالعات و پژوهش‌های شهری و منطقه‌ای (توقف انتشار) 2008-5354 3 11 2012 01 21 Leveling and Planning of Rural Space Tourism in central part of Boyerahmad سطح‌بندی و برنامه‌ریزی فضاهای گردشگری روستایی بخش مرکزی شهرستان بویراحمد 97 118 20004 FA سید رامین غفاری محمود مرادی داوود نیک‌بخت Journal Article 2016 06 14   Leveling and Planning of Rural Space Tourism in central part of Boyerahmad      S.R. Ghafari   Received: 19 June 2010 / Accepted: 14 October 2011, 23-26 P   Assistant Professor of Geography and Rural Planning, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran     M. Moradi.   Assistant Professor of Geography and Rural Planning, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran     D. Nikbakht ( * )   M.A. student of Geography and Rural Planning, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran   e-mail: Nikbakht1351@gmail.com             Extended abstract   1- Intro duction   Lack of ranking, as well as a scientific and systematic approach in specifying structure and place-spatial status of the attractive rural centers and as the result disproportionate distribution of tourism installations and equipments are some of the main and obvious shortages observed in many tourism industry development studies and plans in our country that is tangible (specially in the central part of Boyer-Ahmad County in Kohgilouyeh-Boyer Ahamd Province). The region by having 5 rural districts and 239 villages enjoys some potentialities in terms of tourism development which have not been actualized because of the lack of a comprehensive study and some other reasons.     Therefore, it is necessary to conduct studies about this region through adopting a structural-functional perspective and a spatial-location approach in order to reach two objectives of recognizing and prioritizing rural tourism centers and planning to specify and distribute tourism installations and equipments proportionately and optimally.   There are two questions in this regard, the first one is: Does the region under study enjoy many various natural-ecological and cultural-historical attractions in terms of rural tourism development? And the second one is: Are location-spatial distribution of tourism services in the rural spots and districts located at the research area proportionate to the status and application of each of them? The issue is studied through examining two mentioned hypothese.   It seems that the research region enjoys many various natural-ecological and cultural-historical attractions in terms of rural tourism development and it also seems that the location-spatial distribution of tourism services in the rural centers are not proportionate to the status and application of each of them.   This research has been conducted to rank,set layer, and promote the rural spaces in terms of tourism industry development and reach the mentioned objectives of research in the research area through applying documentary-field method and descriptive-analytic study in some 239 rural spots of the central part of Boyer-Ahmad County and by performing Gottman’s model, statistical testing technique of William Guste,Analysis of variance,Pearson coefficient test and applying Excel, Spss, and Gis software.     2- Theoretical bases   Studying potentialities available in the places considering population, services and economic activities in each area, and preparing a program proportionate to this potentialities or limitations in such a way that it leads to the growth and development of that area is very important. There are different theories about specifying and performing spetiol planning. The World Tourism Organization specifies some 7 steps for tourism planning as: study preparation, determination of objectives, surveys, analysis and synthesis, policy and plan formation, recommendations, implementation and monitoring.   Also, Murphy specifies 4 planning factors as human activities, communications, space, and time. This research investigates this issue through adopting this approach and by performing Gottman’s model and estimating the indicators       3– Discussion   A- Selecting 29 rural tourism districts and their spots in order to specify planning unit in the research area through applying the failure point theory.   B- Specifying and estimating research indices and variabls including (natural-human) and (service-infrastructure) attractions criteria.   P- Performing Gottman’s model with regard to estimating the indices in order to rank and specify the space performance through applying Spss and Excel software.   T- Statistical hypothesis testing with statistical testing technique of William Guste, Analysis of variance, pearson coefficient test   C- Preparing required maps through applying GIS software     4- Conclusion   A-Ranking rural spots in terms of each rural tourism district throughout the whole research area   B-Delineating spatial performance of each rural spot in the process of rural tourism development   P- Ranking 29 rural tourism districts in order to specify potentiality of rural tourism development   T-It was found that the whole research area enjoys natural-ecological and cultural-historical attractions. But distribution of tourism services and installations are disproportionate to the spatial status of each of them and it is more obvious in two districts of Mansour-Khani and Tang-Sorkh.         5- Suggestions   5-1- Investment should be made according to the space status and application of each rural tourism spot and district   5-2-Through recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of rural tourism districts, necessary measure should be taken considering the level and rank of each district.   Some of these suggestions are mentioned in the Matrix No. 5 of the research.       References   Andrej Udovc. & Anton P. (2007) “Role of Rural Tourism for development of rural areas" Journal.central European Agriculture Volum8 no.2 (223-228)   Ardestany, m. (2009), Fundamentals of Rural Tourism, Publishing V Edition org, First Ed, Tehran, P.N 360   Bahrami R. (2010), study ability and straits Development Rural tourism in kordstan province, article collection the con ference Fourth Islam World. Zahdan   Bazargan Lari, A. (1999), a pplied statistics, Shiraz university, First Ed, Shiraz, P.N 322   Doswell, R. (2006), Tourism: How effective Management Makes. The difference,   Gantly, F. (2001),”Tourism Impacts in Azerbaijan: A Sociocultural Analysis, A ph Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Tourism and Food”, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Unpublished. For the environment.   Ghafaari, S.R. (2008), Introduction to the Rural Settlemenet Physical planning, Shahrkord University, Firsted, Shahrkord, P.N 138   Ghafaari, S.R. (2009), Researching-studying design of prioritiy being investment and loction of tourism facilities in the tourist center of Chaharmahal Vbkhtyary province Cultural Heritage Department, Handicrafts Industry and Tourism of Shahrkord ,p.N247   Ghazi, Iran. (2000) An Analytical Appraisal of The Spatial Devlopment Model forTourism Planinng, Journal of the Faculty of Letters and Humanities (university of Isfahan) fall -winter 2000-2001 - (22-23):41-54.   http://www.amar.org.ir/nofoos/1385/default_2524aspqtim14”23/11/2010   http://www.farhangi.parstag1.in/tags/77   Javan ,Jafarr and mehdi Saqai. (2004),role Rural tourism in area Development with emphasis Rural management, Geography and Regional Development Reseach Journal,N:2   JomehPour, M. (2006), An Introduction to: Rural Development Planning: Approaches and methods, Samt, Second Ed, Tehran, and P.N 246   Lumesden. Les. (2007), Tourism Marketing, Translated by M.E Goharian, Cultural Research Bureau.Second Ed, Tehran.PN408   Mohmad, ArabiI. & Davood Izadi, Cultural Research Bureau, Four Ed, Tehran, P. N344   Murphy, Peter E. (1985), Tourism: A C, mmunity Approach, New York: Routledge   Heydari, R. (2008), principles of Tourism Industry planning, Samt, First Ed, P.N 284   Rezvani, M.R. (2005), An Introduction to Rural Development Planning in Iran, Ghoomes Publisher Second Ed, Tehran, Page number 291   Sanai, V. (2004), Tourism Marketing, Marketing Spesialized, Monthly, NO.4   Saqai, M. (2004). Surviving Tourism Idustry in Bandargaz small Province, Big Mohmaddy, Isfahan University Department of Geography   Shakui, H. (2006), New Trends in Philosophy of Geography, GITASHENASI Publisher, Six Ed, Tehran, P. N 355   W.T.O. (2001), concepts, definition and Classification for Tourism statics, Madrid, Spain.       فقدان رتبه ­ بندی علمی و نظام مند در تعیین جایگاه مکانی- فضایی کانون­های جاذب گردشگری روستایی و بالطبع توزیع نامتناسب تأسیسات و تجهیزات از جمله کاستی­های بنیادی و مشهود در مطالعات و طرح­های توسعه صنعت گردشگری در کشور و به ویژه در بخش مرکزی شهرستان بویراحمد است. شهرستان بویراحمد برخوردار از توانمندی­های بالقوه در توسعه گردشگری است که به دلایل مختلف از جمله عدم مطالعه جامع، به فعلیت نرسیده است، پژوهش حاضر به دنبال بررسی توانایی­های طبیعی، تاریخی و فرهنگی و نیز چگونگی توزیع و پراکنش مکانی- فضایی خدمات گردشگری در نقاط و حوزه­های روستایی واقع در قلمرو تحقیق متناسب با جایگاه و عملکرد هر یک بوده است. روش تحقیق، توصیفی- تحلیلی است و با بهره­گیری از روش اسنادی- میدانی در 239 نقطه روستایی دارای سکنه بخش مرکزی شهرستان بویراحمد با اجرای مدل گاتمن و تکنیک­های آماری ویلیام گاست( t )، تحلیل واریانس یک طرفه (آزمون F ) و آزمون همبستگی پیرسون با استفاده از نرم افزارهای Excel ، Spss ، Gis به منظور ، سطح بندی و تعیین سطح فضاهای روستایی از لحاظ توسعه صنعت گردشگری و دست­یابی به اهداف تحقیق انجام گرفته است. نتایج پژوهش نشان دهنده آن است که قلمرو تحقیق از جاذبه­های طبیعی، فرهنگی و تاریخی متعدد و متنوعی، در توسعه گردشگری برخورداراست اما توزیع خدمات و تأسیسات در کانون­های جاذب روستایی نا متعادل و نامتناسب با جایگاه مکانی، فضایی هر یک بوده است از این رو راهبردهای اجرایی در توسعه ساختار و سازمان فضایی حاکم بر حوزه‌های گردشگری روستایی ارائه گردید و برای هرکدام از سطوح، تجهیزات و زیرساخت­های متناسب با آن پیشنهادگردید.   https://urs.ui.ac.ir/article_20004_fa8b166df10302c0eb840f2ca62db12d.pdf